We have now reached the home stretch of both parties’ primaries. Both parties have seen the fight for their nominations devour the weaker candidates, and there is finally a small enough number of remaining states that we can look at what’s left and project the final outcome. For those who are new to the process, and who have not been following Spark!‘s coverage of the primaries, you may wish to see our previous posts on the Election 2016. We began with a brief “Primer on the Primaries” (explaining the process in general), and then divided the events into three “rounds.” Round One ran from the first primaries in February through “Super Tuesday,” March 1, 2016; Round Two ran from Super Tuesday through March 15; and Round Three from that point to the end of April. As of April 29, 2016, there are just over six weeks before the final primaries are concluded.
As of today, Real Clear Politics shows the following results from the primaries already concluded (since they regularly edit their numbers, later visits to their site will reveal different results):
For the Republicans, Donald Trump is the front-runner, with 994 delegates. Ted Cruz has 566, and John Kasich has 153. The winning candidate at the Republican Convention in mid-July will need 1,237 of the 2,472 delegates available. Trump at this point needs 41.4% of the remaining delegates to get there. Neither Cruz nor Kasich has a viable path left to secure the nomination on the first ballot.
For the Democrats, Hillary Clinton remains the front-runner, with 2,165 delegates for the convention, while Bernie Sanders has 1,645. The winning candidate at the Democratic Convention in late July will need 2,382 of the 4,763 delegates available. Clinton needs but 17.5% of the remaining delegates to get there; while Sanders needs a whopping 82.6%.
Both parties also have some delegates allotted to candidates who have already dropped out. Marco Rubio’s 171 delegates stand out most prominently, but there are also a handful of delegates for other candidates like Martin O’Malley and Jeb Bush. The many state parties each have different rules for what delegates for dropped out candidates are expected to do at the convention.
Upcoming Events, and Projections for the Results:
May 3 (Tuesday): Indiana Open Primary for both parties. Indiana will hand out 57 Republican delegates, and 83 Democratic delegates. Trump has been leading Cruz by a small margin in Indiana, although Cruz has picked up points throughout the month of April. For Republicans, Indiana is a “winner takes all” state (the Democrats do not use this practice at all, allotting proportional representation in all of their state and territorial parties), so Trump is the likely winner of all 57 Indiana delegates. Clinton has been ahead of Sanders by only a few percentage points; so both are likely to come away with roughly half of the 83 delegates. Spark! projects the delegates count to be: Clinton 43, Sanders 40. Trump 57.
May 7 (Saturday): Guam Democrats will hold a Closed Caucus, allotting 7 delegates. Polling data is not readily available, although the other two Pacific territories (Northern Marianas and American Samoa) each gave two thirds of their delegates to Clinton. Our projections: Clinton 5, Sanders 2.
May 10 (Tuesday): Nebraska Republicans will hold a Closed Primary for their 36 delegates, allotted on a “winner takes all” basis. No polling data is available; but Nebraska lies in a region that has generally preferred Cruz over Trump, so we project Cruz will take the 36 delegates.
Also on May 10, West Virginia will be holding semi-open primaries for both parties (independents can vote in either party; but party-registered voters may only vote in their registered party). The state will allot 34 Republican delegates, and 29 Democrats. All polling in West Virginia is relatively old (early March at the latest). While the very last Democratic poll had Clinton leading Sanders, most others showed a substantial Sanders advantage; and the demographics of the state also indicates it to be a potential Sanders victory. Trump has held a significant advantage in all, similarly dated polls. We give Clinton 8, Sanders 21; and Trump 25, Cruz 8, and Kasich 1.
May 17 (Tuesday): Oregon Closed Primary for both parties, which will allot 28 Republican delegates and 61 Democrats. In addition, Kentucky Democrats will hold a Closed Primary for their 55 delegates. Trump holds a significant advantage in Oregon (with 43% among Oregon Republicans), although Cruz or even Kasich may get delegates out of the state as well. In both Oregon and Kentucky, Clinton leads by narrow margins (41:38 in OR, 43:38 in KY). For Oregon, we project Clinton 29, Sanders 32; Trump 18, Cruz 7, Kasich 3. For Kentucky, Clinton gets 29, Sanders 26.
May 24 (Tuesday): Washington Republican Closed Primary, allotting 44 delegates on a “winner takes most” form of proportionate allotment, wherein at district levels each candidate can get all delegates from a victory with over 50%, and where each candidate must secure at least 20% to get any delegates from a district. Washington presents an interesting contest for the Republicans, with no good polling data available. However, Trump has generally outperformed Cruz in opinion polling of coastal states (and in actual primaries of the eastern coastal states). On the other hand, Cruz got a narrow edge in Alaska’s delegation. We give Trump 39, Cruz 5.
June 4 (Saturday): Virgin Islands Democratic Closed Caucus, for their 7 delegates. No good polling data is available. We guess and give Clinton 4, Sanders 3.
June 5 (Sunday): Puerto Rico Democratic Open Primary, for their 60 delegates. This delegation is even larger than 27 of the 50 state delegations; and is by far the largest of the non-state delegations. While no polling data is available, the Latino population (and Clinton’s generally friendlier remarks about the island) suggest a likely Clinton advantage and victory. Clinton 35, Sanders 25.
And Finally (cue the fanfare): on June 7 (Tuesday), there will be a massive last battle in both parties for five states: California, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, and South Dakota. Also, the Democrats will hold a Caucus in North Dakota. 303 Republican delegates, and 694 Democrats, are going to be selected for the conventions by these battles.
California’s Closed Primary will allot 172 Republican delegates, and a mountainous 475 Democrats. Trump has a clear lead for the “winner takes all” state, which should present a great victory for the Great Bloviator. Clinton has held a small margin there over Sanders; and the chance for Bernie to pick up a “Yuge” array of delegates there may well reward his campaign’s decision to begin fighting for the state even before the last battle (on April 26) for the Old Colonies of the Northeast. However, we give Clinton 255, Sanders 220; and Trump 172.
Montana’s Open Primary will send 27 Republican and 21 Democratic delegates to the conventions (the Republicans on a “winner takes all” basis). The only polling available is useless, being over a year old. However, regionally, the state’s neighbors have largely favored Cruz and Sanders. Clinton 6, Sanders 15; Cruz 27.
New Jersey’s Primary (Open GOP, Closed Democratic) will decide 51 Republican delegates and a hefty 126 Democrats. A Rutgers poll shows that a Trump victory in the “winner takes all state” is pretty much in the bag already (having over 50% of the state’s Republicans). Clinton has a significant lead on Sanders (51:42), although Sanders is picking up steam. Clinton 67, Sanders 59; Trump 51.
New Mexico’s Closed Primary for 24 Republicans and 34 Democratic delegates. Polling data there is scarce, with the last being in February (with most of the initial clown car still in and hopeful). Trump and Cruz were tied; but together they polled barely half of the votes. New Mexico is the only state whose Republicans on June 7 will not be “winner takes all”; so it is possible all three candidates will get something out of it. Clinton held a 47:33 advantage over Sanders back then; and its western and eastern neighbors have both favored Clinton. New Mexico also is both a state of loyal Democrats, and a state with a large Hispanic population; both of which features also promise a likely victory for Clinton. We give Clinton 20, Sanders 14. Trump gets 11, Cruz 12, and Kasich 1.
South Dakota’s Primary (Closed GOP and Semi-Open Democratic) will allot 29 Republicans and 20 Democrats, with the Republicans on a “winner takes all” basis. Although the state’s delegate counts are fairly low, the state promises an interesting battle. Polling data is completely wanting there; and the state lies in a transition area between Trump’s area and Cruz’s area; and between Clinton’s area and Sanders’s area. It could go any way. Just for fun, we give Clinton 8, Sanders 12; and Cruz 29.
And let us not forget the Democrats’ North Dakota Open Caucus for their 18 delegates, in which we guess Clinton 4, Sanders 14.
After June 7, the Republicans will be done; but there will still be one more Democratic event: on July 14 (Tuesday), the Democrats will hold a Closed Primary for the 20 delegates representing the District of Columbia, to wrap up the 2016 primaries season once and for all. Washington, DC is another place devoid of good polling; but it is located in an area friendly to Clinton, and with a large African-American population, the district is likely to support her pretty prominently. Clinton 16, Sanders 4.
Some totals for those not doing the counting (you’re welcome, by the way): Before June 7, the Republicans will be fighting over some 171 delegates, and the Democrats for 302 (not including super-delegates). On June 7, the Republicans will struggle over another 303 delegates, while (including DC’s June 14 primary) the Democrats will battle for some 714. In total, these will add some 474 Republican delegates and 1,016 Democratic delegates.
Our projections give Donald Trump 139 delegates before 6/7; and 234 on 6/7, for a Round 4 total of 373, and a final total of 1,367, comfortably (for him, at least) over the 1,237 needed to get the nomination without a second-ballot floor fight. Cruz should get 56 delegates before 6/7; and 68 on the 7th, for a Round total of 124, and a final total of 690. Kasich is allotted an optimistic 4 more delegates before 6/7, and another one on the seventh, for a Round total of 5 and a final total of 158. Trump should be the presumptive nominee going into the Cleveland Convention in July, with room to spare.
These projections also give Hillary Clinton 154 delegates before 6/7; and 376 on/after, for a Round 4 total of 530. This would bring her total to 2,695, significantly over the 2,382 needed to win the nomination on the first ballot. Bernie Sanders gets 149 delegates before 6/7; and 338 on and after, bringing his Round 4 earnings to 487, and his final total to 1,844. These numbers do not include another 153 super-delegates who have yet to cast their support; but who are also likely to be strongly pro-Clinton. Clinton should be the presumptive nominee going into the Philadelphia Convention in July, also with room to spare.
Okay, but what is REALLY going to happen?
Obviously, these projections are seeded with presumptions; and of course the first point at which candidates (and voters) may make events happen differently is at the point of these various presumptions. Two presumptions needing closer consideration in particular: Trump’s performance in Indiana and in Washington. The former is a “winner takes all” state; so as long as he wins there, he gets the full tally. But what if Cruz bests him? That takes all 57 votes away from Trump, and turns them over to Cruz. Cruz’s path to the nomination at the first ballot is closed; but he (and the Republican electorate) can still stop a Trump first-ballot victory. Washington is not “winner takes all”; but it gives strong benefits to the leading candidate at the expense of the weaker one(s). We presumed a massive delegate advantage to Trump: 39:5. But Cruz could, perhaps, show a strong performance there (the polling data is lacking; so we presumed a “coastal states” advantage for Trump that may not happen). Those are the two places where our projections gave Trump a major delegates win, and where polling is questionable or lacking. Elsewhere, Cruz could certainly outperform our expectations; but it would matter less (or, as in California and New Jersey, there is little hope of beating those expectations).
Another presumption is one that some Republicans have been mulling over: that the 1,237 delegates target is the ticket to a first-ballot nomination. There has been talk over the internet about the RNC putting through a pre-convention rules change by which the “bound” delegates become unbound (the delegates themselves would have to approve of the change, so the question is, could enough Trump delegates want or be convinced to abandon their support for their putative candidate, vote through the rules change, and “unbind” themselves?). After all Sanders’s talk about a “political revolution,” it seems the RNC is considering throwing their own in-party political revolution to keep the presumptive nominee from getting his prize. There are also, of course, a number of delegates assigned to candidates no longer running (Rubio, Bush, Carson, etc.); and those delegates might end up supporting Cruz (or some new candidate). However, by themselves, they are far too few, and Cruz is far too behind, for that strategy to get him even close to the nomination.
Yet another presumption has been one that Bernie Sanders himself has been trying to deflate, that the Democratic super-delegates are (as they have been so far) going to overwhelmingly support Clinton at the convention. Sanders has been consistently arguing that super-delegates first of all should, and second of all will decide their support based on the pledged delegates vote. The problem with that argument is that it ignores the fact that, momentum and excitement notwithstanding, Clinton has been consistently winning the pledged delegates fight, and is not simply depending on the super-delegates to hand her an unearned victory. As of this writing, Clinton has 1,645 to Sanders’s 1,318 pledged delegates; and our projections bring those totals to 2,174 and 1,805. Super-delegates are unlikely to recuse themselves en masse from voting (if they did, there would indeed be a contested convention, with no candidate getting to the 2,382 threshold for the first ballot). The super-delegates abiding by Sanders’s argument and watching the vote would support the winner for the pledged delegates, and that is almost unquestionably Clinton. Looking at our numbers (and the presumptions behind them), the reader will note that in almost no state won by Clinton did Spark! assign to Clinton an overwhelming majority of the delegates, but gave Sanders fair portions of pretty much every state. California will be the biggest fight; but both candidates are strong there, and even if our numbers and the called winner (Clinton) are wrong, Clinton will still take to the convention delegate numbers similar to those projected. Sanders will find it almost impossible to beat our projection of a pledged delegate margin by anything close to the 370 or so we project.
So Sanders’s “political revolution” depends on the party machinery abandoning not only their traditional role, but also the candidate who has won the most pledged delegates, for a candidate with nothing to offer in terms of reasons for doing any of these (other than his argument – justified by opinion polling – that he is shown to beat Trump in a general election by a greater margin than is Clinton). Then, if the super-delegates do make such a decision, the “political revolution” is more of a coup – with the establishment denying the winning candidate the nomination and handing it to the candidate who had won fewer votes. Exactly the thing Sanders is complaining about as a key to get Clinton nominated, is the only possibility that Sanders himself has at this point for getting nominated.
At any rate, presumptions notwithstanding, Spark! projects that in November, the general election will be one decided between the Democratic ticket headed by Hillary Clinton, and the Republican ticket headed by Donald Trump. We will likely revisit these expectations and projections as we get closer to that last big battle on June 7.
Headline image from Huffingtonpost.com, via The Yale Herald.